Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31364026›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2020

SRF and SRFΔ5 Splicing Isoform Recruit Corepressor LSD1/KDM1A Modifying Structural Neuroplasticity and Environmental Stress Response.

Laura Gerosa, Barbara Grillo, Chiara Forastieri, Alessandra Longaretti, Emanuela Toffolo, Alessandra Mallei, Silvia Bassani, Maurizio Popoli, Elena Battaglioli, Francesco Rusconi

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolution Increases Primates Brain Complexity Extending RbFOX1 Splicing Activity to LSD1 Modulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Psychiatric Disorders and lncRNAs: A Synaptic Match.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura GerosaInstitute of Neuroscience, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Vanvitelli, 32, 20129, Milan, Italy.
Barbara GrilloDipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Traslazionale and Centro di Eccellenza per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEND), Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F.lli Cervi 93, 20090, Segrate, Italy.
Chiara ForastieriDipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Traslazionale and Centro di Eccellenza per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEND), Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F.lli Cervi 93, 20090, Segrate, Italy.
Alessandra LongarettiDipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Traslazionale and Centro di Eccellenza per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEND), Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F.lli Cervi 93, 20090, Segrate, Italy.
Emanuela ToffoloDipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Traslazionale and Centro di Eccellenza per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEND), Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F.lli Cervi 93, 20090, Segrate, Italy.
Alessandra MalleiDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari and CEND, Laboratory of Neuropsychopharmacology and Functional Neurogenomics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti, 9, 20129, Milan, Italy.
Silvia BassaniInstitute of Neuroscience, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Vanvitelli, 32, 20129, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio PopoliDipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari and CEND, Laboratory of Neuropsychopharmacology and Functional Neurogenomics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti, 9, 20129, Milan, Italy.
Elena BattaglioliInstitute of Neuroscience, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Vanvitelli, 32, 20129, Milan, Italy. elena.battaglioli@unimi.it.
Francesco RusconiDipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Traslazionale and Centro di Eccellenza per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEND), Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F.lli Cervi 93, 20090, Segrate, Italy. francesco.rusconi@unimi.it.
University of Milan · ITNational Research Council · ITNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ten to 20% of western countries population suffers from major depression disorder (MDD). Stressful life events represent the main environmental risk factor contributing to the onset of MDD and other stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders. In this regard, investigating brain physiology of stress response underlying the remarkable individual variability in terms of behavioral outcome may uncover stress-vulnerability pathways as a source of candidate targets for conceptually new antidepressant treatments. Serum response factor (SRF) has been addressed as a stress transducer via promoting inherent experience-induced Immediate Early Genes (IEGs) expression in neurons. However, in resting conditions, SRF also represents a transcriptional repressor able to assemble the core LSD1/CoREST/HDAC2 corepressor complex, including demethylase and deacetylase activities. We here show that dominant negative SRF splicing isoform lacking most part of the transactivation domain, namely SRFΔ5, owes its transcriptional repressive behavior to the ability of assembling LSD1/CoREST/HDAC2 corepressor complex meanwhile losing its affinity for transcription-permissive cofactor ELK1. SRFΔ5 is highly expressed in the brain and developmentally regulated. In the light of its activity as negative modulator of dendritic spine density, SRFΔ5 increase along with brain maturation suggests a role in synaptic pruning. Upon acute psychosocial stress, SRFΔ5 isoform transiently increases its levels. Remarkably, when stress is chronically repeated, a different picture occurs where SRF protein becomes stably upregulated in vulnerable mice but not in resilient animals. These data suggest a role for SRFΔ5 that is restricted to acute stress response, while positive modulation of SRF during chronic stress matches the criteria for stress-vulnerability hallmark.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityStress, PhysiologicalAlternative SplicingAnimalsCell ShapeCo-Repressor ProteinsDendritic SpinesHeLa CellsHippocampusHistone Deacetylase 2Histone DemethylasesHumansMice, Inbred C57BLProtein BindingRatsRNA, MessengerCo-Repressor ProteinsHistone Deacetylase 2Histone DemethylasesKDM1a protein, mouseRNA, MessengerSerum Response FactorAlternative splicingHippocampal neuronsLysine specific demethylase 1Neuronal structural plasticityPsychosocial stressSerum response factorStress vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID31364026
OpenAlexW2964402568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.