ArticleMolecular biology reports2019
High-throughput sequencing reveals the gut and lung prokaryotic community profiles of the Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus).
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unexpected Microbial and Genetic Diversity in the Gut of Chinese Giant Salamander.Integrative zoology · 2026Article
- Changes of intestinal microbiota in the giant salamander (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Vertebrate host phylogeny influences gut archaeal diversity.Nature microbiology · 2021Article
- Transcriptome Landscape of Intracellular Brucella ovis Surviving in RAW264.7 Macrophage Immune System.Inflammation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing attention has been attracted to host microbiota, due to their vital impact on host health. Little is known about the microbiota of the Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus), in spite of the high economic and scientific value of this endangered species. This study was designed to characterise and compare the gut and lung prokaryotic communities of the Chinese giant salamander by high-throughput sequencing. Our study showed that the giant salamander had a lung prokaryotic community that clustered separately from its intestinal microbiota. Statistical analysis (LEfSe) revealed that the bacterial populations were dominated by Geobacter, Sulfurimonas, and Dechloromonas from Proteobacteria phylum, and Corynebacterium from Actinobacteria phylum in the lung, while Parabacteroides, Bacteroides, and PW3 from Bacteroidetes phylum, and Oscillospira from Firmicutes phylum were predominant in the intestine. A particularly innovative finding was the fairly high abundance of Archaea, especially methanogenic Euryarchaeota. The gut dominant Archaea were Methanocorpusculum and Thermoplasmata vadinCA11, while Methanosaeta and Methanoculleus were the main Archaea in the lung. PICRUSt analysis revealed differentiated functional profiles between the intestinal miacrobiota and the lung microbiota. Specially, some microbial metabolic functions were significantly more active in the intestinal microbiota, while the functional genes involved in infectious diseases were much richer in the lung microbiota. This study characterized the prokaryotic microbial community profiles in the gut and lung of the Chinese giant salamander, providing foundational support for future study seeking to understand microbiota of the giant salamander and the role of its microbiota on infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.