ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020
Whole-Body [
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of whole-body [European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Metastatic Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma: Diagnostic Performance of Functional Imaging (Cancers · 2025Article
- Radiopharmaceuticals in Malignant Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Immune-Related Applications by PET/CT, SPECT/CT, and PET/MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Performance of [Cancers · 2024Review
- PET/MRI in colorectal and anal cancers: an update.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Article
- Whole-Body MRI for the Detection of Recurrence in Melanoma Patients at High Risk of Relapse.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of simultaneous whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[ PROCEDURES: We included patients with malignant melanoma who underwent a single injection [
resultsBetween July 2014 and December 2018, 22 patients were enrolled. Interrater agreement and overall accuracy (consensus reading) were 78.8 % (95 % CI 71-84.9) and 96.1 % (95 % CI 92.3-98) for PET/MRI and 78 % (70.2-84.3) and 97.4 % (95 % CI 93.7-98.9) for PET/CT, respectively (P = 0.42). PET/MRI reached a region-based Se of 89.1 % (95 % CI 79.4-94.5) and a Sp of 100 %, whereas PET/CT showed a region-based Se of 92.7 % (95 % CI 84-96.9) and a Sp of 100 % for the detection of metastatic disease in malignant melanoma.
conclusionsWhole-body [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.