Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363930›Full record

ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2019

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells for Targeting Solid Tumors: Current Challenges and Existing Strategies.

Lorraine Springuel, Caroline Lonez, Bertrand Alexandre, Eric Van Cutsem, Jean-Pascal H Machiels, Marc Van Den Eynde, Hans Prenen, Alain Hendlisz, Leila Shaza, Javier Carrasco and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Targeting tumor metabolism to augment CD8Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A genetically encoded protein tag for control and quantitative imaging of CAR T cell therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Challenges and new technologies in adoptive cell therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Monitoring Therapeutic Response to Anti-FAP CAR T Cells Using [18F]AlF-FAPI-74.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. TCR engineered T cells for solid tumor immunotherapy.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lorraine SpringuelCelyad SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.
Caroline LonezCelyad SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9230-3855
Bertrand AlexandreCelyad SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.
Eric Van CutsemUniversity Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jean-Pascal H MachielsCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc Van Den EyndeCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Hans PrenenUniversity Hospital Antwerp (UZ Antwerp), Antwerp, Belgium.
Alain HendliszInstitut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Leila ShazaInstitut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Javier CarrascoGrand Hôpital de Charleroi (GHdC), Charleroi, Belgium.
Jean-Luc CanonGrand Hôpital de Charleroi (GHdC), Charleroi, Belgium.
Mateusz OpyrchalRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kunle OdunsiRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sylvie RotteyGhent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
David E GilhamCelyad SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.
Anne FlamentCelyad SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.
Frédéric F LehmannCelyad SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium. flehmann@celyad.com.

Funding

RPCI-UPCI Ovarian Cancer SPOREP50CA159981 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B., ODUNSI, KUNLE · 2013 to 2025
$19.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA159981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells (CAR-Ts) are an exciting new cancer treatment modality exemplified by the recent regulatory approval of two CD19-targeted CAR-T therapies for certain B cell malignancies. However, this success in the hematological setting has yet to translate to a significant level of objective clinical responses in the solid tumor setting. The reason for this lack of translation undoubtedly lies in the substantial challenges raised by solid tumors to all therapies, including CAR-T, that differ from B cell malignancies. For instance, intravenously infused CAR-Ts are likely to make rapid contact with cancerous B cells since both tend to reside in the same vascular compartments within the body. By contrast, solid cancers tend to form discrete tumor masses with an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment composed of tumor cells and non-tumor stromal cells served by abnormal vasculature that restricts lymphocyte infiltration and suppresses immune function, expansion, and persistence. Moreover, the paucity of uniquely and homogeneously expressed tumor antigens and inherent plasticity of cancer cells provide major challenges to the specificity, potency, and overall effectiveness of CAR-T therapies. This review focuses on the major preclinical and clinical strategies currently being pursued to tackle these challenges in order to drive the success of CAR-T therapy against solid tumors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeoplasmsReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31363930
PMCPMC6790340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.