Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363891›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Minimally invasive tele-mentoring opportunity-the mito project.

Jose Quezada, Pablo Achurra, Cristian Jarry, Domenech Asbun, Rodrigo Tejos, Martín Inzunza, Gabriel Ulloa, Andres Neyem, Carlos Martínez, Carlo Marino and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Remote Teaching of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. LATIN AMERICAN RESIDENTS' SURGICAL EDUCATION AFTER THE PANDEMIC: WHAT STRATEGIES HAVE EMERGED FOR ADAPTING TO THIS NEW ERA?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Review
  16. Remote training in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021
    Article
  17. Auditorium of the future: e learning platform.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jose QuezadaExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo AchurraExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Cristian JarryExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Domenech AsbunDepartment of Surgery, UCSF Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA.
Rodrigo TejosExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Martín InzunzaExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Gabriel UlloaComputer Science Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Andres NeyemComputer Science Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Carlos MartínezExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Carlo MarinoExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Gabriel EscalonaExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile.
Julian VarasExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Clinic Hospital, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, Santiago, Chile. jevaras@uc.cl.ORCID 0000-0003-4890-9937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation training is a validated method for acquiring laparoscopic skills. Training sessions may be sporadic or lack continuity in oversight by instructors since traditional programs mandate in-person teaching and evaluation. This study presents the development, implementation, and results of a novel smartphone application that enables remote teacher-student interaction. This interface is used to complete a validated program that provides learner-specific feedback. Outcomes of training via Lapp were compared to outcomes of traditional in-person training.

methodsA web-based and mobile iOS and Android application (Lapp) was developed to enable a remote student-teacher interaction. Instructors use Lapp to assess video recorded training sessions of students at distant locations and guide them through the laparoscopic skill course with specific and personalized feedback. Surgical trainees at two remote training centers were taught using Lapp. A control group was assessed during traditional simulation training at the training facility, with in-person feedback. Pre- and post-training performances were video recorded for each trainee and blindly evaluated by two experts using a global rating scale (GRS) and a specific rating scale (SRS).

resultsA total of 30 trainees were trained via Lapp and compared with 25 locally taught. Performance in the Lapp group improved significantly after the course in both GRS and SRS scores, from 15 [6-17] to 23 [20-25], and from 12 [11-15] to 18 [15-20], respectively. The results between both groups were comparable.

conclusionLaparoscopic simulation training using a mobile app is as effective as in-person instruction in teaching advanced laparoscopic surgical skills. Lapp provides an effective method of teaching through simulation remotely and may allow expansion of robust simulation training curriculums.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMentoringSimulation TrainingVideo RecordingSimulation trainingSurgical education technologyTele-mentoringTele-proctoringTele-simulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.