ArticleAMB Express2019
Rumen fermentation and microbial community composition influenced by live Enterococcus faecium supplementation.
Article in AMB Express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory Effects of Pediococcus Pentosaceus JASB0677 Isolated from Naturally Fermented Yak Yogurt on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Metabolism.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Characterization of Enterococcus faecalis JM263 from the Yak Gut on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A Probiotic Candidate with Strong Fiber-Degrading Capacity.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Enhancing the fiber degradation efficiency in dairy cattle rumen through engineered bacterial communities.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring rumen fermentation and microbial populations in Dhofari goats fed a chitosan-added diet.Animal biotechnology · 2024Article
- Performance responses of lactating Rahmani ewes fed diet supplemented withAnimal biotechnology · 2023Article
- The isolation of rumen enterococci strains along with high potential utilizing cyanide.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing of Gut Microbiota Affected by Four Probiotic Strains in Mice.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial resistance determinants in silage.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Review
- Whole genome sequence analyses-based assessment of virulence potential and antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial swine and cattle probiotic products.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Draft Genome Sequences of Two Strains of Enterococcus lactis Showing High Potential as Cattle Probiotic Supplements.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021Article
- Research progress on the application of feed additives in ruminal methane emission reduction: a review.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Effect of microbial feed additives on growth performance, microbial protein synthesis, and rumen microbial population in growing lambs.Translational animal science · 2020Article
- Impact of Fermented Corn-Soybean Meal on Gene Expression of Immunity in the Blood, Level of Secretory Immunoglobulin A, and Mucosa-Associated Bacterial Community in the Intestine of Grower-Finisher Pigs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Symbiotic Supplementation (Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Supplementation of appropriate probiotics can improve the health and productivity of ruminants while mitigating environmental methane production. Hence, this study was conducted to determine the effects of Enterococcus faecium SROD on in vitro rumen fermentation, methane concentration, and microbial population structure. Ruminal samples were collected from ruminally cannulated Holstein-Friesian cattle, and 40:60 rice straw to concentrate ratio was used as substrate. Fresh culture of E. faecium SROD at different inclusion rates (0, 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1.0%) were investigated using in vitro rumen fermentation system. Addition of E. faecium SROD had a significant effect on total gas production with the greatest effect observed with 0.1% supplementation; however, there was no significant influence on pH. Supplementation of 0.1% E. faecium SROD resulted in the highest propionate (P = 0.005) but the lowest methane concentration (P = 0.001). In addition, acetate, butyrate, and total VFA concentrations in treatments were comparatively higher than control. Bioinformatics analysis revealed the predominance of the bacterial phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes and the archaeal phylum Euryarchaeota. At the genus level, Prevotella (15-17%) and Methanobrevibacter (96%) dominated the bacterial and archaeal communities of the in vitro rumen fermenta, respectively. Supplementation of 0.1% E. faecium SROD resulted in the highest quantities of total bacteria and Ruminococcus flavefaciens, whereas 1.0% E. faecium SROD resulted in the highest contents of total fungi and Fibrobacter succinogenes. Overall, supplementation of 0.1% E. faecium SROD significantly increased the propionate and total volatile fatty acids concentrations but decreased the methane concentration while changing the microbial community abundance and composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.