ReviewInsights into imaging2019
Anatomical variation in the ankle and foot: from incidental finding to inductor of pathology. Part I: ankle and hindfoot.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two Distinct Flexor Hallucis Longus Muscles and Tendons: Case Report.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Male National Basketball Association G-League and Collegiate Basketball Athletes Have a High Prevalence of Radiographic Ankle Abnormalities.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Accessory Tibionavicular Muscle: An Unusual Cause of Medial Ankle Pain.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2023Article
- Isolated, periosteal stripping injuries of the Flexor Retinaculum: Case series of 3 patients with clinico-radiological review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2023Article
- Asymptomatic Foot and Ankle Abnormalities in Elite Professional Soccer Players.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- A Woman with Posterior Heel Pain: Ultrasound Imaging for Os Trigonum Syndrome.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accessory anatomical structures in the ankle and foot usually represent incidental imaging findings; however, they may also eventually represent a source of pathology, such as painful syndromes, degenerative changes, be the subject of overuse and trauma or appear as masses and cause compression syndromes or impingement.This review aims to describe and illustrate the imaging findings related to the presence of accessory ossicles and muscles in the ankle and hindfoot through different techniques, with special attention to those variants that associate factors of clinical relevance or that trigger challenges in the differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.