Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363499›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2019

The grant is dead, long live the data - migration as a pragmatic exit strategy for research data preservation.

Tomasz Zielinski, Johnny Hay, Andrew J Millar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomasz ZielinskiSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0194-5706
Johnny HayEPCC, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9685-3718
Andrew J MillarSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1756-3654

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018040/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open research, data sharing and data re-use have become a priority for publicly- and charity-funded research. Efficient data management naturally requires computational resources that assist in data description, preservation and discovery. While it is possible to fund development of data management systems, currently it is more difficult to sustain data resources beyond the original grants. That puts the safety of the data at risk and undermines the very purpose of data gathering. PlaSMo stands for 'Plant Systems-biology Modelling' and the PlaSMo model repository was envisioned by the plant systems biology community in 2005 with the initial funding lasting until 2010. We addressed the sustainability of the PlaSMo repository and assured preservation of these data by implementing an exit strategy. For our exit strategy we migrated data to an alternative, public repository with secured funding. We describe details of our decision process and aspects of the implementation. Our experience may serve as an example for other projects in a similar situation. We share our reflections on the sustainability of biological data management and the future outcomes of its funding. We expect it to be a useful input for funding bodies.

Indexed as

Data sharingexit strategyresearch data managementresearch fundingsustainable data infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID31363499
PMCPMC6652102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.