Whole Breast and Lymph Node Irradiation using Halcyon™ 2.0 Utilizing Automatic Multi-isocenter Treatment Delivery and Daily Kilovoltage Cone-beam Computed Tomography.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. An IMRT planning technique for treating whole breast or chest wall with regional lymph nodes on Halcyon and Ethos.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
   Article
2. Dosimetric comparison of VitalBeamJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021
   Article
3. Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020
   Article
4. Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy employing a dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator and helical tomotherapy for cervix uteri.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as