Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363420›Full record

ArticleFuture science OA2019

Impact of measurement error on predicting population-based inpatient glucose control.

George E Saulnier, Janna C Castro, Curtiss B Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future science OA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

George E SaulnierDepartment of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Janna C CastroDepartment of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Curtiss B CookMayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, & Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, AZ 85259, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimInstrument measurement error (ME) may affect ability of damped trend analysis to forecast inpatient glycemic control. MATERIALS &

methodsA statistical approach was developed to introduce ME into damped trend analysis algorithm. Point-of-care blood glucose device data were extracted from the laboratory system. Forecasts were generated from various inpatient subgroups and time intervals.

resultsME produced differences in damped trend model during the forecast learning cycle. However, forecast trajectory stayed identical regardless of ME in 85% (119/140) of studied scenarios. Forecasts did not change with greater ME.

conclusionME inherent in the point-of-care blood glucose device had little effect on trajectory of damped trend exponential forecasts and apparently would not influence decision making in inpatient glycemic control algorithms.

Indexed as

endocrinologyoutcomes researchprognostics

Identifiers

PMID31363420
PMCPMC6554693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.