Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363320›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2019

SONOELASTOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF HIGH-RISK BREAST LESIONS AND DUCTAL CARCINOMA

Maja Crnogorac, Gordana Ivanac, Čedna Tomasović-Lončarić, Rado Žic, Tomislav Kelava, Boris Brkljačić

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maja Crnogorac1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Pathology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Physiology and Immunology, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Gordana Ivanac1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Pathology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Physiology and Immunology, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Čedna Tomasović-Lončarić1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Pathology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Physiology and Immunology, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Rado Žic1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Pathology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Physiology and Immunology, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav Kelava1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Pathology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Physiology and Immunology, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Boris Brkljačić1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Department of Pathology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 4Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia; 5Department of Physiology and Immunology, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quantitative sonoelastographic values recorded on shear-wave sonoelastography (SWE) of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCalcinosisCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, MammaryBreast neoplasms – classificationBreast neoplasms – diagnostic imagingCarcinoma, intraductalElasticity imaging techniquesElastic modulusSensitivity and specificityShear-wave elastography (SWE)Ultrasonography, mammary

Identifiers

PMID31363320
PMCPMC6629205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.