Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363173›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2019

Coherence of Microcystis species revealed through population genomics.

Olga M Pérez-Carrascal, Yves Terrat, Alessandra Giani, Nathalie Fortin, Charles W Greer, Nicolas Tromas, B Jesse Shapiro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Secondary metabolism ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tracking putativemSystems · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization of Five CRISPR Systems inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Microcystin shapes theISME communications · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Expression ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Science advances · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Olga M Pérez-Carrascal *Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. olga.maria.perez-carrascal@umontreal.ca.
Yves Terrat *Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alessandra GianiFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-8534
Nathalie FortinNational Research Council of Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Charles W GreerNational Research Council of Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8953-7810
Nicolas TromasDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. nicolas.tromas@umontreal.ca.
B Jesse ShapiroDépartement de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-8699
Université de Montréal · CANational Research Council Canada · CAUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microcystis is a genus of freshwater cyanobacteria, which causes harmful blooms in ecosystems worldwide. Some Microcystis strains produce harmful toxins such as microcystin, impacting drinking water quality. Microcystis colony morphology, rather than genetic similarity, is often used to classify Microcystis into morphospecies. Yet colony morphology is a plastic trait, which can change depending on environmental and laboratory culture conditions, and is thus an inadequate criterion for species delineation. Furthermore, Microcystis populations are thought to disperse globally and constitute a homogeneous gene pool. However, this assertion is based on relatively incomplete characterization of Microcystis genomic diversity. To better understand these issues, we performed a population genomic analysis of 33 newly sequenced genomes mainly from Canada and Brazil. We identified 17 Microcystis clusters of genomic similarity, five of which correspond to monophyletic clades containing at least three newly sequenced genomes. Four out of these five clades match to named morphospecies. Notably, M. aeruginosa is paraphyletic, distributed across 12 genomic clusters, suggesting it is not a coherent species. A few clades of closely related isolates are specific to a unique geographic location, suggesting biogeographic structure over relatively short evolutionary time scales. Higher homologous recombination rates within than between clades further suggest that monophyletic groups might adhere to a Biological Species-like concept, in which barriers to gene flow maintain species distinctness. However, certain genes-including some involved in microcystin and micropeptin biosynthesis-are recombined between monophyletic groups in the same geographic location, suggesting local adaptation.

Indexed as

BrazilCanadaEcosystemEvolution, MolecularFresh WaterGenome, BacterialMetagenomicsMicrocystinsMicrocystisPhylogenymicrocystinMicrocystins

Identifiers

PMID31363173
PMCPMC6863881
OpenAlexW2965214956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.