Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363152›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Individual Differences in Response to Ambiguous Stimuli in a Modified Go/No-Go Paradigm are Associated with Personality in Family Dogs.

Nóra Bunford, Barbara Csibra, Márta Gácsi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating ADHD Assessment for Dogs: A Replication Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nóra BunfordEötvös Loránd University, Institute of Biology, Department of Ethology, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, Budapest, 1117, Hungary. nb243610@ohio.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9645-604X
Barbara CsibraHungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Márta GácsiEötvös Loránd University, Institute of Biology, Department of Ethology, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.
Eötvös Loránd University · HUInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive biases, often used as indices of affective and emotional states, are associated with individual differences in personality in humans and have been observed in nonhuman animals, including dogs. Although dogs have complementary advantages over traditional animal models of human cognition, little is known about the relationship between dogs' cognitive bias and personality. Here, we examined in 29 family dogs (representing 14 breeds and 12 mutts; M

Indexed as

IndividualityAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionDogsFemaleMaleNeuropsychological TestsPersonalityPetsReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID31363152
PMCPMC6667502
OpenAlexW2965031604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.