Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363135›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Assembling real networks from synthetic and unstructured subsets: the corporate reporting case.

Eduardo Viegas, Hayato Goto, Misako Takayasu, Hideki Takayasu, Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduardo ViegasCentre for Complexity Science and Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, London, United Kingdom. e.viegas11@imperial.ac.uk.
Hayato GotoCentre for Complexity Science and Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, London, United Kingdom.
Misako TakayasuInstitute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259, Nagatsuta-cho, Yokohama, 226-8502, Japan.
Hideki TakayasuInstitute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259, Nagatsuta-cho, Yokohama, 226-8502, Japan.
Henrik Jeldtoft JensenCentre for Complexity Science and Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-3288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of interfirm business transaction networks provides invaluable insight into the trading dynamics and economic structure of countries. However, there is a general scarcity of data available recording real, accurate and extensive information for these types of networks. As a result, and in common with other types of network studies - such as protein interactions for instance - research tends to rely on partial and incomplete datasets, i.e. subsets, with less certain conclusions. Here, we make use of unstructured financial and corporate reporting data in Japan as the base source to construct a financial reporting network, which is then compared and contrasted to the wider real business transaction network. The comparative analysis between these two rich datasets - the proxy, partially derived network and the real, complete network at macro as well as local structural levels - provides an enhanced understanding of the non trivial relationships between partial sampled subsets and fully formed networks. Furthermore, we present an elemental agent based pruning algorithm that reconciles and preserves key structural differences between these two networks, which may serve as an embryonic generic framework of potentially wider use to network research, enabling enhanced extrapolation of conclusions from partial data or subsets.

Identifiers

PMID31363135
PMCPMC6667694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.