ArticleScientific reports2019
Musical interaction is influenced by underlying predictive models and musical expertise.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rhythmic Structure Shapes Dyadic Self-Other Representations Through Interpersonal Action Coupling.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- The Social, Decoupled Self: Interpersonal Synchronization of Breathing Alters Intrapersonal Cardiorespiratory Coupling.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Beyond perfect synchrony: shared interpersonal rhythmic timing enhances self-other merging judgements.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Spontaneous movement synchrony as an exogenous source for interbrain synchronization in cooperative learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Embodied perspective-taking enhances interpersonal synchronization: A body-swap study.iScience · 2023Article
- Cortico-cerebellar audio-motor regions coordinate self and other in musical joint action.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Magnetoencephalography recordings reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of recognition memory for complex versus simple auditory sequences.Communications biology · 2022Article
- The dynamics of musical participation.Musicae scientiae : the journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music · 2022Article
- Music in the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Are We in Time? How Predictive Coding and Dynamical Systems Explain Musical Synchrony.Current directions in psychological science · 2022Article
- Follow the sound of my violin: Granger causality reflects information flow in sound.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- A metastable attractor model of self-other integration (MEAMSO) in rhythmic synchronization.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Modality-specific attractor dynamics in dyadic entrainment.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Potential Role of Dopamine in Mediating Motor Function and Interpersonal Synchrony.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Transient brain networks underlying interpersonal strategies during synchronized action.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- Mothers as Home DJs: Recorded Music and Young Children's Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Considerations in Audio-Visual Interaction Models: An ERP Study of Music Perception by Musicians and Non-musicians.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Audiovisual Modulation in Music Perception for Musicians and Non-musicians.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- A Kuramoto model of self-other integration across interpersonal synchronization strategies.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musical interaction is a unique model for understanding humans' ability to align goals, intentions, and actions, which also allows for the manipulation of participants' internal predictive models of upcoming events. Here we used polyrhythms to construct two joint finger tapping tasks that even when rhythmically dissimilar resulted in equal inter-tap intervals (ITIs). Thus, behaviourally a dyad of two musicians tap isochronously at the same rate, yet with their own distinct rhythmical context model (RCM). We recruited 22 highly skilled musicians (in 11 dyads) and contrasted the effect of having a shared versus non-shared RCM on dyads' synchronization behaviour. As expected, tapping synchronization was significantly worse at the start of trials with non-shared models compared to trials with a shared model. However, the musicians were able to quickly recover when holding dissimilar predictive models. We characterised the directionality in the tapping behaviour of the dyads and found patterns mostly of mutual adaptation. Yet, in a subset of dyads primarily consisting of drummers, we found significantly different synchronization patterns, suggesting that instrument expertise can significantly affect synchronization strategies. Overall, this demonstrates that holding different predictive models impacts synchronization in musicians performing joint finger tapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.