Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31363096›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Real-time decoding of question-and-answer speech dialogue using human cortical activity.

David A Moses, Matthew K Leonard, Joseph G Makin, Edward F Chang

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David A MosesDepartment of Neurological Surgery and the Center for Integrative Neuroscience at UC San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Matthew K LeonardDepartment of Neurological Surgery and the Center for Integrative Neuroscience at UC San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Joseph G MakinDepartment of Neurological Surgery and the Center for Integrative Neuroscience at UC San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Edward F ChangDepartment of Neurological Surgery and the Center for Integrative Neuroscience at UC San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. Edward.Chang@ucsf.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural communication often occurs in dialogue, differentially engaging auditory and sensorimotor brain regions during listening and speaking. However, previous attempts to decode speech directly from the human brain typically consider listening or speaking tasks in isolation. Here, human participants listened to questions and responded aloud with answers while we used high-density electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings to detect when they heard or said an utterance and to then decode the utterance's identity. Because certain answers were only plausible responses to certain questions, we could dynamically update the prior probabilities of each answer using the decoded question likelihoods as context. We decode produced and perceived utterances with accuracy rates as high as 61% and 76%, respectively (chance is 7% and 20%). Contextual integration of decoded question likelihoods significantly improves answer decoding. These results demonstrate real-time decoding of speech in an interactive, conversational setting, which has important implications for patients who are unable to communicate.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesBrain MappingCerebral CortexElectrocorticographyElectrodes, ImplantedEpilepsyFemaleHumansSpeechTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31363096
PMCPMC6667454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.