ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
The problem with delineating narrow criteria for citizen science.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Delineating the contours of citizen science: Development of the ECSA characteristics of citizen science.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Fostering citizen-engaged HIV implementation science.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Dark citizen science.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2024Article
- Standardised data on initiatives-STARDIT: Beta version.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- How media presence triggers participation in citizen science-The case of the mosquito monitoring project 'Mückenatlas'.PloS one · 2022Article
- Contours of citizen science: a vignette study.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- The role of passive surveillance and citizen science in plant health.CABI agriculture and bioscience · 2020Review
- Reply to Auerbach et al.: How our Opinion piece invites collaboration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- How Biomedical Citizen Scientists Define What They Do: It's All in the Name.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.