Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362935›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2019

Exploring the characteristics, acuity and management of adult ED patients at night-time.

Rebecca Simpson, Susan Croft, Colin O'Keeffe, Richard Jacques, Tony Stone, Nisar Ahmed, Suzanne M Mason

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca SimpsonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1677-5938
Susan CroftSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Colin O'KeeffeSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Richard JacquesSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Tony StoneSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nisar AhmedSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Suzanne M MasonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesED care is required for acutely unwell and injured patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics and activity of type 1 ED attendances according to whether their time of arrival was during the day (08:00-18:00) or at night (18:00-08:00).

methodsHospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from NHS Digital for all A&E and admitted patient care activity provided by all acute (not mental health or primary care) NHS hospital trusts in Yorkshire and Humber (1 April 2011 to 31 March 2014) for adult patients were analysed. Adjusted linear and logistic regression was used to model the data.

resultsAdjusted regression analysis results show that patients who attended ED at night waited an extra 18.76 (95% CI 18.62 to 18.89) min to be seen by a clinician. They also spent an additional 13.64 (95% CI 13.47 to 13.81) min total in ED. Patients who attended at night were OR 2.20 (95% CI 2.17 to 2.23) times more likely to leave without being seen. They were also OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.27) times more likely to re-attend the ED and were OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.21) times more likely to present with non-urgent conditions. Overnight patients were more likely to be admitted to hospital, OR 1.09 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.10) times, however, those admitted were more likely to have a short-stay admission.

conclusionThere is an 'overnight effect' of patients attending EDs. Patients wait longer, leave without being seen, attend with non-urgent problems and are more likely to be admitted for a short stay. Further work is required to identify the potential underlying causes of these differences.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsYoung Adultemergency and urgent careemergency department attendancesemergency medicineout of hours effectovernight effect

Identifiers

PMID31362935
PMCPMC6818519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.