Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362883›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[Comparison of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgery: a randomized trial].

Naseh Taher-Baneh, Negin Ghadamie, Farzad Sarshivi, Reza Sahraie, Karim Nasseri

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06685705 (Comparative Study Between Intrathecal Magnesium Sulfate, Neostigmine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant for Bubivacaine in Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Abdominal Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06685705 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this map

Comparative Study Between Intrathecal Magnesium Sulfate, Neostigmine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant for Bubivacaine in Postoperative Analgesia in Lower Abdominal Surgeries

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsMagnesium Sulfate, Neostigmine, FentanylArmsMagnesium Sulfate and Bupivacaine 0.125%, bupivacaine and Neostigmine, fentanyl and bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naseh Taher-BanehKurdistan University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Sanandaj, Irã.
Negin GhadamieKurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Sanandaj, Irã.
Farzad SarshiviKurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Sanandaj, Irã.
Reza SahraieKurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sanandaj, Irã.
Karim NasseriKurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Sanandaj, Irã. Electronic address: nasseri_k@muk.ac.ir.
Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOne of the disadvantages of unilateral spinal anesthesia is the short duration of post-operative analgesia, which can be addressed by adding adjuvants to local anesthetics. The aim of current study was to compare the effects of adding dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, or saline to bupivacaine on the properties of unilateral spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing calf surgery.

methodsIn this double-blind clinical trial, 90 patients who underwent elective calf surgery were randomly divided into three groups. The spinal anesthetic rate in each of the three groups was 1mL bupivacaine 0.5% (5mg). In groups BD, BF and BS, 5μg of dexmedetomidine, 25μg of fentanyl and 0.5mL saline were added, respectively. The duration of the motor and sensory blocks in both limbs and the rate of pain during 24h after surgery were calculated. Hemodynamic changes were also measured during anesthesia for up to 90min.

resultsThe duration of both of motor and sensory block was significantly longer in dependent limb in the BF (96 and 169min) and BD (92 and 166min) groups than the BS (84 and 157min) group. Visual Analog Scale was significantly lower in the two groups of BF (1.4) and BD (1.3), within 24h after surgery, than the BS (1.6) group.

conclusionsThe addition of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in unilateral spinal anesthesia can increase the duration of the motor and sensory block in dependent limb and prolong the duration of postoperative pain. However, fentanyl is more effective than dexmedetomidine.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, AnesthesiaAdultAnesthesia, SpinalAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFentanylHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainYoung AdultAdjuvants, AnesthesiaAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineDexmedetomidineFentanylBupivacaínaBupivacaineDexmedetomidinaDexmedetomidineFentanilFentanylRaquianestesia unilateralUnilateral spinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID31362883
PMCPMC9391866
OpenAlexW2945558559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.