Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362730›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary and alternative medicine2019

Distal acupoint stimulation versus peri-incisional stimulation for postoperative pain in open abdominal surgery: a systematic review and implications for clinical practice.

Juan Zhu, Qian Xu, Rong Zou, Wenzhong Wu, Xiaoqiu Wang, Yanyi Wang, Fangbing Ji, Zhen Zheng, Man Zheng

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Acupuncture and Postoperative Pain Reduction.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juan ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Qian XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Rong ZouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Wenzhong WuDepartment of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xiaoqiu WangDepartment of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Yanyi WangDiscipline of Chinese Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO BOX 71, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
Fangbing JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Zhen ZhengDiscipline of Chinese Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO BOX 71, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia. zhen.zheng@rmit.edu.au.
Man ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155, Nanjing, 210029, China. man_zheng@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8674-2253

Funding

Institutional Foundation of Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of TCM Y2018rc21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute postoperative pain remains a major clinical problem that affects patient recovery. Distal acupoint and peri-incisional stimulation are both used for relieving acute postoperative pain in hospital. Our objective was to assess and compare the effects of distal and peri-incisional stimulation on postoperative pain in open abdominal surgery.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese databases CNKI and Wanfangdata were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. Intensity of postoperative pain, opioid consumption and related data were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed. Subgroup analyses were conducted when data were enough.

resultsThirty-five trials were included, in which 17 trials studied distal stimulation, another 17 trials studied peri-incisional stimulation and one studied the combination of the two approaches. No studies that directly compared the two approaches were identified. Subgroup analysis showed that both distal and peri-incisional stimulation significantly alleviated postoperative resting and movement pain from 4 h to 48 h after surgery by 6 to 25 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Peri-incisional stimulation showed a better reduction in postoperative opioid consumption. No studies compared the effects of the combined peri-incisional and distal stimulation with either mode alone. Overall the quality of evidence was moderate due to a lack of blinding in some studies, and unclear risk of allocation concealment.

conclusionBoth distal and peri-incisional modes of stimulation were effective in reducing postoperative pain. Whether a combined peri-incisional stimulation and distal acupuncture has superior results requires further studies.

Indexed as

Acupuncture PointsAcupuncture TherapyAbdomenFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeDistal acupoint stimulationOpen abdominal surgeryPeri-incisional stimulationPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID31362730
PMCPMC6668193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.