Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362684›Full record

ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2020

Osteoporosis: Current and Emerging Therapies Targeted to Immunological Checkpoints.

Massimo De Martinis, Maria Maddalena Sirufo, Lia Ginaldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Carnosol inhibits osteoclastogenesisMolecular medicine reports · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Microbiota-Bone-Allergy Interplay.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Osteoporosis therapies and their mechanisms of action (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Massimo De MartinisDepartment of Life, Health, & Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Maria Maddalena SirufoDepartment of Life, Health, & Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Lia GinaldiDepartment of Life, Health, & Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a skeletal pathology characterized by compromised bone strength leading to increased risk of fracture, mainly the spine and hip fractures. Osteoporosis affects more than 200 million people worldwide and because of the skeletal fractures it causes, represents a major cause of morbidity, disability and mortality in older people. Recently, the new discoveries of osteoimmunology have clarified many of the pathogenetic mechanisms of osteoporosis, helping to identify new immunological targets for its treatment opening the way for new and effective therapies with biological drugs. Currently, there are basically two monoclonal antibodies for osteoporosis therapy: denosumab and romosozumab. Here, we focus on the modern approach to the osteoporosis management and in particular, on current and developing biologic drugs targeted to new immunological checkpoints, in the landscape of osteoimmunology.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overBone and BonesBone DensityDenosumabHumansDenosumabbiological therapiesbone remodelingcytokinesimmunological checkpointsosteoimmunologyOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID31362684
PMCPMC8206194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.