Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362652›Full record

ArticleProtein and peptide letters2020

Chicken CATH-2 Increases Antigen Presentation Markers on Chicken Monocytes and Macrophages.

Marina D Kraaij, Albert van Dijk, Maaike R Scheenstra, Roel M van Harten, Henk P Haagsman, Edwin J A Veldhuizen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein and peptide letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina D KraaijDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Albert van DijkDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Maaike R ScheenstraDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Roel M van HartenDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Henk P HaagsmanDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Edwin J A VeldhuizenDivision of Molecular Host Defence, Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCathelicidins are a family of Host Defense Peptides (HDPs), that play an important role in the innate immune response. They exert both broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against pathogens, and strong immunomodulatory functions that affect the response of innate and adaptive immune cells.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate immunomodulation by the chicken cathelicidin CATH-2 and compare its activities to those of the human cathelicidin LL-37.

methodsChicken macrophages and chicken monocytes were incubated with cathelicidins. Activation of immune cells was determined by measuring surface markers Mannose Receptor Ctype 1 (MRC1) and MHC-II. Cytokine production was measured by qPCR and nitric oxide production was determined using the Griess assay. Finally, the effect of cathelicidins on phagocytosis was measured using carboxylate-modified polystyrene latex beads.

resultsCATH-2 and its all-D enantiomer D-CATH-2 increased MRC1 and MHC-II expression, markers for antigen presentation, on primary chicken monocytes, whereas LL-37 did not. D-CATH- 2 also increased the MRC1 and MHC-II expression if a chicken macrophage cell line (HD11 cells) was used. In addition, LPS-induced NO production by HD11 cells was inhibited by CATH-2 and D-CATH-2.

conclusionThese results are a clear indication that CATH-2 (and D-CATH-2) affect the activation state of monocytes and macrophages, which leads to optimization of the innate immune response and enhancement of the adaptive immune response.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiomarkersCathelicidinsCell LineChickensCytokinesGene Expression RegulationHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansImmunity, InnateImmunomodulationLectins, C-TypeMacrophagesAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiomarkersCathelicidinsCytokinesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IILectins, C-TypeMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorReceptors, Cell Surfaceantigen presentationcathelicidinsHD11 cellsHost defense peptideinnate immunity.MRC1

Identifiers

PMID31362652
PMCPMC6978643
OpenAlexW2964699743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.