Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362610›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

When resistance is futile, tolerate instead: silicon promotes plant compensatory growth when attacked by above- and belowground herbivores.

Scott N Johnson, Olivia L Reynolds, Geoff M Gurr, Jessica L Esveld, Ben D Moore, Gavin J Tory, Andrew N Gherlenda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott N JohnsonHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Olivia L ReynoldsGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Geoff M GurrInstitute of Applied Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Jessica L EsveldHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ben D MooreHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gavin J ToryAustralian Steel Mill Services, Port Kembla, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew N GherlendaHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Western Sydney University · AUCharles Sturt University · AUNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants have evolved numerous herbivore defences that are resistance- or tolerance-based. Resistance involves physical and chemical traits that deter and/or harm herbivores whereas tolerance minimizes fitness costs of herbivory, often via compensatory growth. The Poaceae frequently accumulate large amounts of silicon (Si), which can be used for herbivore resistance, including biomechanical and (indirectly) biochemical defences. To date, it is unclear whether Si improves tolerance of herbivory. Here we report how Si enabled a cereal (Triticum aestivum) to tolerate damage inflicted by above- and belowground herbivores. Leaf herbivory increased Si concentrations in the leaves by greater than 50% relative to herbivore-free plants, indicating it was an inducible defensive response. In plants without Si supplementation, leaf herbivory reduced shoot biomass by 52% and root herbivory reduced root biomass by 68%. Si supplementation, however, facilitated compensatory growth such that shoot losses were more than compensated for (+14% greater than herbivore-free plants) and root losses were minimized to -16%. Si supplementation did not improve plant resistance since Si did not enhance biomechanical resistance (i.e. force of fracture) or reduce leaf consumption and herbivore relative growth rates. We propose that Si-based defence operates in wheat via tolerance either in addition or as an alternative to resistance-based defence.

Indexed as

HerbivorySiliconBiomassPlant LeavesPoaceaeSiliconbiomechanicsHelicoverpa armigeraplant defenceroot herbivoresilicasilicon

Identifiers

PMID31362610
PMCPMC6684990
OpenAlexW2965139530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.