ArticleCancer biology & therapy
Invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma: a clinicopathological analysis of three cases.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma of the cervix: a report of 34 cases of immunohistochemical and clinicopathological findings.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics of invasive stratified mucinous carcinoma of the cervix and the expression and clinical significance of SLC7A11, SLC3A2 and PD-L1.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma (ISMC) of uterine cervix: description of pathological findings and prognosis factors in a series of 15 Chinese patients.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- The coexistence of invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma and non-specific type and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a case report.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.