Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362520›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2019

Population-based observational study of acute pancreatitis in southern England.

PanWessex Study Group, Wessex Surgical Trainee Research Collaborative, Alex Mirnezami, Ben Knight, Brendan Moran, Fergus Noble, Graham Branagan, John Primrose, Katherine Pearson, Malcolm West and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

PanWessex Study GroupDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Wessex Surgical Trainee Research CollaborativeDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Alex Mirnezami
Ben Knight
Brendan Moran
Fergus Noble
Graham Branagan
John Primrose
Katherine Pearson
Malcolm West
Nathan Curtis
Phil Pucher
Ramsey Cuttress
Sian Pugh
Tim Underwood

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute pancreatitis is a common surgical emergency. Identifying variations in presentation, incidence and management may assist standardisation and optimisation of care. The objective of the study was to document the current incidence management and outcomes of acute pancreatitis against international guidelines, and to assess temporal trends over the past 20 years.

methodsA prospective four-month audit of patients with acute pancreatitis was performed across the Wessex region. The Atlanta 2012 classifications were used to define cases, severity and complications. Outcomes were recorded using validated systems and correlated against guideline standards. Case ascertainment was validated with clinical coding and hospital episode statistics data.

resultsA total of 283 patient admissions with acute pancreatitis were identified. Aetiology included 153 gallstones (54%), 65 idiopathic (23%), 29 alcohol (10%), 9 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (3%), 6 drug related (2%), 5 tumour (2%) and 16 other (6%). Compliance with guidelines had improved compared with our previous regional audit. Results were 6.5% mortality, 74% severity stratification, 23% idiopathic cases, 65% definitive treatment of gallstones within 2 weeks, 39% computed tomography within 6-10 days of severe pancreatitis presentation and 82% severe pancreatitis critical care admission. The Atlanta 2012 severity criteria significantly correlated with critical care stay, length of stay, development of complications and mortality (2% vs 6% vs 36%,

conclusionsThe incidence of acute pancreatitis in southern England has risen substantially. The Atlanta 2012 classification identifies patients with severe pancreatitis who have a high risk of fatal outcome. Acute pancreatitis management is seen to have evolved in keeping with new evidence and updated clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlcohol DrinkingCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCritical CareEnglandFemaleGallstonesHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedAcute pancreatitisAuditEpidemiologyManagement

Identifiers

PMID31362520
PMCPMC6667964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.