Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362392›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Rumen and Fecal Microbial Community Structure of Holstein and Jersey Dairy Cows as Affected by Breed, Diet, and Residual Feed Intake.

Samantha J Noel, Dana W Olijhoek, Farran Mclean, Peter Løvendahl, Peter Lund, Ole Højberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Research progress in isolation and identification of rumen probiotics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha J NoelDepartment of Animal Science, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark. samantha.noel@anis.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-9598
Dana W OlijhoekDepartment of Animal Science, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5798-3608
Farran McleanDepartment of Animal Science, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Peter LøvendahlDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Peter LundDepartment of Animal Science, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Ole HøjbergDepartment of Animal Science, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4947-4536

Funding

Danish Milk Levy Fund (Mælkeafgiftsfonden) Feed Utilization in Nordic CattleInnovationsfonden REMRUM Contract no. 12-132447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying factors that influence the composition of the microbial population in the digestive system of dairy cattle will be key in regulating these populations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, we analyzed rumen and fecal samples from five high residual feed intake (RFI) Holstein cows, five low RFI Holstein cows, five high RFI Jersey cows and five low RFI Jersey cows, fed either a high-concentrate diet (expected to reduce methane emission) or a high-forage diet. Bacterial communities from both the rumen and feces were profiled using Illumina sequencing on the 16S rRNA gene. Rumen archaeal communities were profiled using Terminal-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) targeting the mcrA gene. The rumen methanogen community was influenced by breed but not by diet or RFI. The rumen bacterial community was influenced by breed and diet but not by RFI. The fecal bacterial community was influenced by individual animal variation and, to a lesser extent, by breed and diet but not by RFI. Only the bacterial community correlated with methane production. Community differences seen in the rumen were reduced or absent in feces, except in the case of animal-to-animal variation, where differences were more pronounced. The two cattle breeds had different levels of response to the dietary intervention; therefore, it may be appropriate to individually tailor methane reduction strategies to each cattle breed.

Indexed as

cattle breedmethanemicrobiomenext-generation sequencingresidual feed intake

Identifiers

PMID31362392
PMCPMC6721167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.