Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362366›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Cell

Maria J Ribeiro, Mónica J B Amorim, Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria J RibeiroDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Mónica J B AmorimDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. mjamorim@ua.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-8137-3295
Janeck J Scott-FordsmandDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsovej 25, P.O. BOX 314, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark.

Funding

Centro de Estudos Ambientais e Marinhos, Universidade de Aveiro UID/AMB/50017/2019FP7 Environment 604305Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016771, PTDC/AAG-MAA/4084/2014Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/95027/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil invertebrates have been widely used in ecotoxicology studies for decades, although their use as in vitro models, albeit promising, has not been pursued as much. The immune cells of earthworms (coelomocytes) and the coelomic fluid can be used, and are a highly relevant in vitro system. Although it has been tested before, to cover the testing of nanomaterials (NMs), several challenges should be considered. NMs characteristics (dispersibility, agglomeration, etc.) can interfere with the common in vitro methodologies, not only during exposure, but also during the measurements. Here, we have assessed the effect of a CuO NMs case study using surface-modified particles, functionalized for safe-by-design strategies with ascorbate, citrate, polyethylenimine, and polyvinylpyrrolidinone, plus the pristine CuO NMs and copper chloride (CuCl

Indexed as

coelomocytescopper oxide nanoparticlesearthwormsflow cytometrysafe by designsurface modification

Identifiers

PMID31362366
PMCPMC6723996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.