ArticleRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2019
Nonclinical safety assessment of PF614: A novel TAAP prodrug of oxycodone for chronic pain indication.
Article in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PF614, a novel trypsin activated abuse protection (TAAP) prodrug of oxycodone, is being studied as chronic pain analgesic with extended release and abuse resistant properties. A series of nonclinical safety studies were conducted to support PF614 introduction to clinical trials. Ames assays (PF614 and its metabolites), comet assay (PF614 ≤ 50 mg/kg/day oral gavage in rats) and micronucleus assay (PF614 ≤ 175 mg/kg/day oral gavage in rats) were negative. hERG assay IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.