Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31362002›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2019

Patient perceptions of treatment with medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in the Vermont hub-and-spoke system.

Richard A Rawson, Traci Rieckmann, Sarah Cousins, Michael McCann, Regina Pearce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Content analysis of perceptions of combined pharmacobehavioral treatment for American Indian people with opioid use disorder.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard A RawsonVermont Center for Behavior and Health, Lerner School of Medicine, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05733, USA; Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 11075 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. Electronic address: rrawson@uvm.edu.
Traci RieckmannGreenField Health, Portland, OR, USA; School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, CB669, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Sarah CousinsIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 11075 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 200, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.
Michael McCannVermont Center for Behavior and Health, Lerner School of Medicine, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05733, USA.
Regina PearceVermont Center for Behavior and Health, Lerner School of Medicine, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05733, USA.

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2013, Vermont leaders implemented the "hub-and-spoke" (H & S) system to increase access to medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD). "Hubs" are licensed specialty opioid treatment programs (OTPs) with the authority to dispense buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone. "Spokes" are primary care practices that provide office-based opioid treatment, primarily with buprenorphine/naloxone. This report describes the qualitative component of an evaluation of the H&S system, conducted in 2016. The qualitative data collection assessed patient perspectives about the positive and negative aspects of treatment in the H & S system. The data collected included 80 responses to five open-ended questions and 24 in-depth interviews. Five open-ended questions were completed with hub (n = 40) and spoke (n = 40) participants. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with different hub (n =12) and spoke (n =12) participants. Findings from both data collection approaches suggest positive perceptions about treatment overall by patients treated in both settings. Participants treated in spokes reported a positive treatment environment, minimal stigma, and few obstacles to treatment and a strong positive relationship with their prescriber. Hub patients valued the MOUD and expressed gratitude for having access to MOUD, but reported the treatment environment was somewhat challenging, with long lines and drug talk in the clinic, high staff turnover and "cookie cutter" treatment. There appear to be some differences in patient perceptions of MOUD treatment between patients treated in primary care settings and specialized OTP settings.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBuprenorphineFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersVermontBuprenorphineMethadoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsHub and spokeMedication-assisted treatmentMedication treatment for opioid use disorders (MOUD)Opioid use disorderSystem of care

Identifiers

PMID31362002
PMCPMC8190573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.