Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31361894›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Genome-wide epistasis and co-selection study using mutual information.

Johan Pensar, Santeri Puranen, Brian Arnold, Neil MacAlasdair, Juri Kuronen, Gerry Tonkin-Hill, Maiju Pesonen, Yingying Xu, Aleksi Sipola, Leonor Sánchez-Busó and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of potential pathogenic targets and survival strategies ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. An Epistatic Network DescribesFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Johan PensarDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT), Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Santeri PuranenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT), Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Brian ArnoldDivision of Informatics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Neil MacAlasdairParasites and Microbes, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Juri KuronenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0317, Norway.
Gerry Tonkin-HillParasites and Microbes, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Maiju PesonenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT), Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Yingying XuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT), Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Aleksi SipolaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT), Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Leonor Sánchez-BusóParasites and Microbes, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
John A LeesDepartment of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Claire ChewapreechaDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Stephen D BentleyParasites and Microbes, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Simon R HarrisParasites and Microbes, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
Julian ParkhillDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ES, UK.
Nicholas J CroucherMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, St. Mary's Campus, Imperial College London, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Jukka CoranderDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT), Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust 107378/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covariance-based discovery of polymorphisms under co-selective pressure or epistasis has received considerable recent attention in population genomics. Both statistical modeling of the population level covariation of alleles across the chromosome and model-free testing of dependencies between pairs of polymorphisms have been shown to successfully uncover patterns of selection in bacterial populations. Here we introduce a model-free method, SpydrPick, whose computational efficiency enables analysis at the scale of pan-genomes of many bacteria. SpydrPick incorporates an efficient correction for population structure, which adjusts for the phylogenetic signal in the data without requiring an explicit phylogenetic tree. We also introduce a new type of visualization of the results similar to the Manhattan plots used in genome-wide association studies, which enables rapid exploration of the identified signals of co-evolution. Simulations demonstrate the usefulness of our method and give some insight to when this type of analysis is most likely to be successful. Application of the method to large population genomic datasets of two major human pathogens, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis, revealed both previously identified and novel putative targets of co-selection related to virulence and antibiotic resistance, highlighting the potential of this approach to drive molecular discoveries, even in the absence of phenotypic data.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenomicsComputational BiologyDrug Resistance, MicrobialGenome, BacterialHumansMetagenomicsNeisseria meningitidisStreptococcus pneumoniaeVirulence

Identifiers

PMID31361894
PMCPMC6765119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.