SynthesisPLoS medicine2019
Competition and price among brand-name drugs in the same class: A systematic review of the evidence.
Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The impact of the United States most favored nation policies on prices of branded medicines and research and development.Health policy OPEN · 2026Review
- Price trend, clinical benefit and within-class competition of drugs for metastatic Non-small cell lung cancer in China: a retrospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Assessing Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Biosimilars: Results from a National Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Value-Based Indication-Specific Pricing and Weighted-Average Pricing: Estimated Price and Cost Savings for Cancer Drugs.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Review
- Pharmacological class effects of anticancer drugs: opportunities for decreasing healthcare spending.BMJ oncology · 2024Article
- Launch and Post-Launch Prices of Injectable Cancer Drugs in the US: Clinical Benefit, Innovation, Epidemiology, and Competition.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- The estimated annual financial impact of gene therapy in the United States.Gene therapy · 2023Article
- A national survey on registered products, availability, prices, and affordability of 100 essential medicines in community pharmacies across Sri Lanka.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Trends in Medicare Spending on Oral Drugs for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia From 2014 to 2020.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Cost Savings and Increased Access With Ultra-Low-Dose Immunotherapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
- Association of Research and Development Investments With Treatment Costs for New Drugs Approved From 2009 to 2018.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Cancer Drug Approvals That Displaced Existing Standard-of-Care Therapies, 2016-2021.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Trends in Prices of Drugs Used to Treat Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US From 2015 to 2020.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Anticancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2009 to 2020 According to Their Mechanism of Action.JAMA network open · 2021Observational
- A systematic review of pharmaceutical price mark-up practice and its implementation.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021Review
- Demand Creation for COVID-19 Vaccination: Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy through Social Marketing.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Why France Spends Less Than the United States on Drugs: A Comparative Study of Drug Pricing and Pricing Regulation.The Milbank quarterly · 2021Article
- Trends in Within-Class Changes in US Average Wholesale Prices for Brand-Name Medications for Common Conditions From 2015 to 2020.JAMA network open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome experts have proposed combating rising drug prices by promoting brand-brand competition, a situation that is supposed to arise when multiple US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved brand-name products in the same class are indicated for the same condition. However, numerous reports exist of price increases following the introduction of brand-name competition, suggesting that it may not be effective. We performed a systematic literature review of the peer-reviewed health policy and economics literature to better understand the interplay between new drug entry and intraclass drug prices. METHODS AND
findingsWe searched PubMed and EconLit for original studies on brand-brand competition in the US market published in English between January 1990 and April 2019. We performed a qualitative synthesis of each study's data, recording its primary objective, methodology, and results. We found 10 empirical investigations, with 1 study each on antihypertensives, anti-infectives, central nervous system stimulants for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis, histamine-2 (H2) blockers, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; 2 studies on cancer medications; and 2 studies on all marketed or new drugs. None of the studies reported that brand-brand competition lowers list prices of existing drugs within a class. The findings of 2 studies suggest that such competition may help restrain how new drug prices are set. Other studies found evidence that brand-brand competition was mediated by the relative quality of competing drugs and the extent to which they are marketed, with safer or more effective new drugs and greater marketing associated with higher intraclass list prices. Our investigation was limited by the studies' use of list rather than net prices and the age of some of the data.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that policies to promote brand-brand competition in the US pharmaceutical market, such as accelerating approval of non-first-in-class drugs, will likely not result in lower drug list prices absent additional structural reforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.