Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31361364›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2019

Toward Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for North America.

Anne Fairbrother, Derek Muir, Keith R Solomon, Gerald T Ankley, Murray A Rudd, Alistair B A Boxall, Jennifer N Apell, Kevin L Armbrust, Bonnie J Blalock, Sarah R Bowman and 27 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Toxicology Advances for 21One earth (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Anne FairbrotherExponent, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Derek MuirAquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington ON, Canada.
Keith R SolomonSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Gerald T AnkleyUS Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.
Murray A RuddWorld Maritime University, Malmo, Sweden.
Alistair B A BoxallEnvironment and Geography Department, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Jennifer N ApellDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kevin L ArmbrustDepartment of Environmental Sciences, College of the Coast and Environment, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Bonnie J BlalockSchool for the Environment, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah R BowmanMichigan Department of Environmental Quality, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Linda M CampbellEnvironmental Science, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
George P CobbDepartment of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Kristin A ConnorsProcter and Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
David A DreierCenter for Environmental & Human Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Marlene S EvansAquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington ON, Canada.
Carol J HenryGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC.
Robert A HokeDuPont, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Magali HoudeAquatic Contaminants Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington ON, Canada.
Stephen J KlaineClemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Rebecca D KlaperUniversity of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Sigrun A KullikCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Roman P LannoOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Charles MeyerShell Oil Company, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mary Ann OttingerDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Elias OziolorDepartment of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Elijah J PetersenMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Helen C PoyntonSchool for the Environment, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pamela J RiceUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.
Gabriela Rodriguez-FuentesUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alan SamelFMC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Joseph R ShawSchool of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Jeffery A SteevensUS Geological Survey, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Tim A VerslyckeGradient, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Doris E Vidal-DorschSouthern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, California, USA.
Scott M WeirQueen's University of Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Peter WilsonSanofi, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bryan W BrooksProcter and Gamble, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6277-9852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticipating, identifying, and prioritizing strategic needs represent essential activities by research organizations. Decided benefits emerge when these pursuits engage globally important environment and health goals, including the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. To this end, horizon scanning efforts can facilitate identification of specific research needs to address grand challenges. We report and discuss 40 priority research questions following engagement of scientists and engineers in North America. These timely questions identify the importance of stimulating innovation and developing new methods, tools, and concepts in environmental chemistry and toxicology to improve assessment and management of chemical contaminants and other diverse environmental stressors. Grand challenges to achieving sustainable management of the environment are becoming increasingly complex and structured by global megatrends, which collectively challenge existing sustainable environmental quality efforts. Transdisciplinary, systems-based approaches will be required to define and avoid adverse biological effects across temporal and spatial gradients. Similarly, coordinated research activities among organizations within and among countries are necessary to address the priority research needs reported here. Acquiring answers to these 40 research questions will not be trivial, but doing so promises to advance sustainable environmental quality in the 21st century. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1606-1624. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcotoxicologyResearchHumansNorth AmericaSustainable DevelopmentEmerging concernsEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental hazard/risk assessmentEnvironmental toxicologyGlobal megatrendsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID31361364
PMCPMC6852658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.