Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31361093›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2019

Human entorhinal cortex electrical stimulation evoked short-latency potentials in the broad neocortical regions: Evidence from cortico-cortical evoked potential recordings.

Hirofumi Takeyama, Riki Matsumoto, Kiyohide Usami, Takuro Nakae, Katsuya Kobayashi, Akihiro Shimotake, Takayuki Kikuchi, Kazumichi Yoshida, Takeharu Kunieda, Susumu Miyamoto and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Reduces Network Hypersynchrony and Persistent Vertigo.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Signatures of Electrical Stimulation Driven Network Interactions in the Human Limbic System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hirofumi TakeyamaDepartment of Respiratory Care and Sleep Control Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1941-8293
Riki MatsumotoDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kiyohide UsamiDepartment of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuro NakaeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shiga Medical Center for Adults, Moriyama, Japan.
Katsuya KobayashiDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiro ShimotakeDepartment of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki KikuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazumichi YoshidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeharu KuniedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan.
Susumu MiyamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryosuke TakahashiDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Akio IkedaDepartment of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPMatsuyama University · JPShiga Medical Center for Adults · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed at clarifying the clinical significance of the responses evoked by human entorhinal cortex (EC) electrical stimulation by means of cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs).

methodsWe enrolled nine patients with medically intractable medial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent invasive presurgical evaluations with subdural or depth electrodes. Single-pulse electrical stimulation was delivered to the EC and fusiform gyrus (FG), and their evoked potentials were compared. The correlation between the evoked potentials and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) score was analyzed to investigate whether memory circuit was involved in the generation of the evoked potentials.

resultsIn most electrodes placed on the neocortex, EC stimulation induced unique evoked potentials with positive polarity, termed as "widespread P1" (P1w). Compared with FG stimulation, P1w induced by EC stimulation were distinguished by their high occurrence rate, short peak latency (mean: 20.1 ms), small peak amplitude, and waveform uniformity among different recording sites. A stimulation of more posterior parts of the EC induced P1w with shorter latency and larger amplitude. P1w peak amplitude had a positive correlation (r = .69) with the visual memory score of the WMS-R. In one patient, with depth electrode implanted into the hippocampus, the giant evoked potentials were recorded in the electrodes of the anterior hippocampus and EC near the stimulus site.

conclusionsThe human EC electrical stimulation evoked the short-latency potentials in the broad neocortical regions. The origin of P1w remains unclear, although the limited evidence suggests that P1w is the far-field potential by the volume conduction of giant evoked potential from the EC itself and hippocampus. The significance of the present study is that those evoked potentials may be a potential biomarker of memory impairment in various neurological diseases, and we provided direct evidence for the functional subdivisions along the anterior-posterior axis in the human EC.

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedEntorhinal CortexEpilepsy, Temporal LobeEvoked PotentialsFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedNeocortexTemporal LobeYoung Adultcortico-cortical evoked potentialelectrical stimulationentorhinal cortexhippocampusmemory

Identifiers

PMID31361093
PMCPMC6749511
OpenAlexW2966135970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.