ArticleBrain and behavior2019
Human entorhinal cortex electrical stimulation evoked short-latency potentials in the broad neocortical regions: Evidence from cortico-cortical evoked potential recordings.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodologies to detect cortico-cortical evoked potentials: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Reduces Network Hypersynchrony and Persistent Vertigo.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021Trial
- Directed cortico-limbic dialogue in the human brain.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Signatures of Electrical Stimulation Driven Network Interactions in the Human Limbic System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Physiological and pathological neuronal connectivity in the living human brain based on intracranial EEG signals: the current state of research.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Improving the Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS): A Systematic Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Neuroimaging Markers of Mal de Débarquement Syndrome.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Human entorhinal cortex electrical stimulation evoked short-latency potentials in the broad neocortical regions: Evidence from cortico-cortical evoked potential recordings.Brain and behavior · 2019Article
- A systematic exploration of parameters affecting evoked intracranial potentials in patients with epilepsy.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed at clarifying the clinical significance of the responses evoked by human entorhinal cortex (EC) electrical stimulation by means of cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs).
methodsWe enrolled nine patients with medically intractable medial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent invasive presurgical evaluations with subdural or depth electrodes. Single-pulse electrical stimulation was delivered to the EC and fusiform gyrus (FG), and their evoked potentials were compared. The correlation between the evoked potentials and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) score was analyzed to investigate whether memory circuit was involved in the generation of the evoked potentials.
resultsIn most electrodes placed on the neocortex, EC stimulation induced unique evoked potentials with positive polarity, termed as "widespread P1" (P1w). Compared with FG stimulation, P1w induced by EC stimulation were distinguished by their high occurrence rate, short peak latency (mean: 20.1 ms), small peak amplitude, and waveform uniformity among different recording sites. A stimulation of more posterior parts of the EC induced P1w with shorter latency and larger amplitude. P1w peak amplitude had a positive correlation (r = .69) with the visual memory score of the WMS-R. In one patient, with depth electrode implanted into the hippocampus, the giant evoked potentials were recorded in the electrodes of the anterior hippocampus and EC near the stimulus site.
conclusionsThe human EC electrical stimulation evoked the short-latency potentials in the broad neocortical regions. The origin of P1w remains unclear, although the limited evidence suggests that P1w is the far-field potential by the volume conduction of giant evoked potential from the EC itself and hippocampus. The significance of the present study is that those evoked potentials may be a potential biomarker of memory impairment in various neurological diseases, and we provided direct evidence for the functional subdivisions along the anterior-posterior axis in the human EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.