Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31361002›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Online health community experiences of sexual minority women with cancer.

Young Ji Lee, Charles Kamen, Liz Margolies, Ulrike Boehmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Self-Expression and Sharing around Chronic Illness on TikTok.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Health informatics and health equity: improving our reach and impact.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Young Ji LeeDepartment of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Charles KamenDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Liz MargoliesNational LGBT Cancer Network, New York City, New York, USA.
Ulrike BoehmerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Exercise Intervention for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Cancer SurvivorsK07CA190529 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KAMEN, CHARLES STEWART · 2015 to 2019
$830k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA190529NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to explore online health communities (OHCs) for sexual minority women (SMW) with cancer by conducting computational text analysis on posts. MATERIALS AND

methodsEight moderated OHCs were hosted by the National LGBT Cancer Network from 2013 to 2015. Forty-six SMW wrote a total of 885 posts across the OHCs, which were analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count and latent Dirichlet allocation. Pearson correlation was calculated between Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count word categories and participant engagement in the OHCs. Latent Dirichlet allocation was used to derive main topics.

resultsParticipants (average age 46 years; 89% white/non-Hispanic) who used more sadness, female-reference, drives, and religion-related words were more likely to post in the OHCs. Ten topics emerged: coping, holidays and vacation, cancer diagnosis and treatment, structure of day-to-day life, self-care, loved ones, physical recovery, support systems, body image, and symptom management. Coping was the most common topic; symptom management was the least common topic. DISCUSSION: Highly engaged SMW in the OHCs connected to others via their shared female gender identity. Topics discussed in these OHCs were similar to OHCs for heterosexual women, and sexual identity was not a dominant topic. The presence of OHC moderators may have driven participation. Formal comparison between sexual minority and heterosexual women's OHCs are needed.

conclusionsOur findings contribute to a better understanding of the experiences of SMW cancer survivors and can inform the development of tailored OHC-based interventions for SMW who are survivors of cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSelf-Help GroupsSexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConsumer Health InformaticsFemaleHumansInternetMiddle Agedconsumer health informaticshealth equityonline health communitysexual minoritytopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID31361002
PMCPMC6696497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.