ArticleInternational Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition : [proceedings]. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition2018
A BIOMECHANICAL AND THERMAL ANALYSIS FOR BONE AUGMENTATION OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR.
Article in International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition : [proceedings]. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A biomechanically-guided planning and execution paradigm for osteoporotic hip augmentation: Experimental evaluation of the biomechanics and temperature-rise.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2021Article
- Significance of preoperative planning for prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic hip: A computational modeling study.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we aim to create and validate a Finite Element (FE) model to estimate the bone temperature after cement injection and compare the simulation temperature results with experimental data in three key locations of the proximal femur. Simulation results suggest that the maximum temperature-rise measured at the bone surface is 10°C which occurs about 12 minutes after the injection. Temperature profiles measured during the experiment showed an agreement with those of the simulation with an average error of 1.73°C Although additional experiments are required to further validate the model, results of this study suggest that this model is a promising tool for bone augmentation planning to lower the risk of thermal necrosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.