Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360864›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2018

Clinical Importance of Myc Family Oncogene Aberrations in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

MoonSun Jung, Amanda J Russell, Catherine Kennedy, Andrew J Gifford, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Kylie-Ann Mallitt, Siva Sivarajasingam, David D Bowtell, Anna DeFazio, Michelle Haber and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Remics: a redescription-based framework for multi-omics analysis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. c-MYC and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

MoonSun JungChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Amanda J RussellChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Catherine KennedyDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrew J GiffordChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
Kylie-Ann MallittCentre for Big Data Research in Health/School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Siva SivarajasingamChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
David D BowtellChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Anna DeFazioDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital and Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michelle HaberChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Murray D NorrisChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Michelle J HendersonChildren's Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUChildren's Cancer Institute Australia · AUThe University of Sydney · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Myc oncogene family has been implicated in many human malignancies and is often associated with particularly aggressive disease, suggesting Myc as an attractive prognostic marker and therapeutic target. However, for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), there is little consensus on the incidence and clinical relevance of Myc aberrations. Here we comprehensively investigated alterations in gene copy number, expression, and activity for Myc and evaluated their clinical significance in EOC.

methodsTo address inconsistencies in the literature regarding the definition of copy number variations, we developed a novel approach using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) coupled with a statistical algorithm to estimate objective thresholds for detecting Myc gain/amplification in large cohorts of serous (n = 150) and endometrioid (n = 80) EOC.

resultsUsing a large panel of cancer cell lines (n = 34), we validated the statistical algorithm for determining clear thresholds for Myc gain/amplification.

conclusionA systematic and comprehensive analysis of Myc genes, transcripts, and activity levels using qPCR revealed that although such aberrations commonly occur in EOC, overall they have limited impact on outcome, suggesting that the biological relevance of Myc oncogene family members is limited to certain subsets of this disease.

Identifiers

PMID31360864
PMCPMC6649713
OpenAlexW2901543823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.