Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360844›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2018

Major Impact of Sampling Methodology on Gene Expression in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Qiong Gao, Elena López-Knowles, Maggie Chon U Cheang, James Morden, Ricardo Ribas, Kally Sidhu, David Evans, Vera Martins, Andrew Dodson, Anthony Skene and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Thousands of oscillating LncRNAs in the mouse testis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Duration of Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitors on Molecular Expression Profiles in Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Qiong GaoBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Elena López-KnowlesBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Maggie Chon U CheangClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
James MordenClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Ricardo RibasBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Kally SidhuRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research.
David EvansRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research.
Vera MartinsRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research.
Andrew DodsonRalph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research.
Anthony SkeneRoyal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Chris HolcombeRoyal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Elizabeth MallonQueen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow, Govan, UK.
Abigail EvansPoole General Hospital, Dorset, UK.
Judith M BlissClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
John RobertsonUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ian SmithBreast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Lesley-Ann MartinBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Mitch DowsettBreast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
POETIC Trial Management Group and Trialists
Institute of Cancer Research · GBBreast Cancer Now · GBPoole Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBRoyal Bournemouth Hospital · GBRoyal Liverpool University Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 8671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the impact of sampling methodology on gene expression data from primary estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer biopsies, global gene expression was measured in core-cut biopsies at baseline and surgery from patients randomly assigned to receive either two weeks of presurgical aromatase inhibitor (AI; n = 157) or no presurgical treatment (n = 56). Those genes most markedly altered in the AI group (eg,

Identifiers

PMID31360844
PMCPMC6649758
OpenAlexW2803733701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.