Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360723›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2019

Utilisation of Electronic Health Records for Public Health in Asia: A Review of Success Factors and Potential Challenges.

Lesley Dornan, Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish, Wichuda Jiraporncharoen, Ahmar Hashmi, Nisachol Dejkriengkraikul, Chaisiri Angkurawaranon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. The doctor, the patient, and the computer.Clinical hematology international · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Advancing multimorbidity management in primary care: a narrative review.Primary health care research & development · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lesley DornanDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Kanokporn PinyopornpanishDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Wichuda JiraporncharoenDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Ahmar HashmiDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Nisachol DejkriengkraikulDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Chaisiri AngkurawaranonDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4206-9164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic health records offer a valuable resource to improve health surveillance and evaluation as well as informing clinical decision making. They have been introduced in many different settings, including low- and middle-income countries, yet little is known of the progress and effectiveness of similar information systems within Asia. This study examines the implementation of EHR systems for use at a population health level in Asia and to identify their current role within public health, key success factors, and potential barriers in implementation. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic search process was implemented. Five databases were searched with MeSH key terms and Boolean phrases. Articles selected for this review were based on hospital provider electronic records with a component of implementation, utilisation, or evaluation for health systems or at least beyond direct patient care. A proposed analytic framework considered three interactive components: the content, the process, and the context.

resultsThirty-two articles were included in the review. Evidence suggests that benefits are significant but identifying and addressing potential challenges are critical for success. A comprehensive preparation process is necessary to implement an effective and flexible system. DISCUSSION: Electronic health records implemented for public health can allow the identification of disease patterns, seasonality, and global trends as well as risks to vulnerable populations. Addressing implementation challenges will facilitate the development and efficacy of public health initiatives in Asia to identify current health needs and mitigate future risks.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth StatusNational Health ProgramsAsiaHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID31360723
PMCPMC6644215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.