Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360700›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2019

Maternal Body Mass Index and Risk of Congenital Heart Defects in Infants: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

Xuezhen Liu, Guoyong Ding, Weili Yang, Xia Feng, Yuejin Li, Huamin Liu, Qianqian Zhang, Long Ji, Dong Li

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Obesity during pregnancy is associated to congenital cardiopathies in the newborn].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuezhen LiuSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Guoyong DingSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Weili YangSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Xia FengSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Yuejin LiSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Huamin LiuSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Qianqian ZhangSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Long JiSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0333-6645
Dong LiSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-7151
Shandong First Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe exact shape of the dose-response relationship between maternal body mass index (BMI) and the risk of congenital heart defects (CHDs) in infants has not been clearly defined yet. This study aims to further clarify the relationship between maternal obesity and the risk of CHDs in infants by an overall and dose-response meta-analysis.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify all related studies. The studies were limited to human cohort or case-control studies in English language. Random-effect models and dose-response meta-analysis were used to synthesize the results. Heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also assessed.

resultsNineteen studies with 2,416,546 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with the mothers with normal weight, the pooled relative risks (RRs) of infants with CHDs were 1.08 (95% CI=1.03-1.13) in overweight and 1.23 (95% CI=1.17-1.29) in obese mothers. According to the findings from the linear meta-analysis, we observed an increased risk of infants with CHDs (RR=1.07, 95% CI=1.06-1.08) for each 5 kg/m

conclusionThe results from our meta-analysis indicate that increased maternal BMI is related to increased risk of CHDs in infants.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHeart Defects, CongenitalObesityPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31360700
PMCPMC6642764
OpenAlexW2953921179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.