ReviewJornal vascular brasileiro2019
Intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the aorta: uncertainties and controversies.
Review in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial aortic repair versus medical therapy for early uncomplicated type B dissections.PloS one · 2025Article
- Efficacy of endovascular repair in the treatment of retrograde ascending aortic intramural haematoma.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Article
- Updates in aortic wall pathology.Surgery today · 2022Review
- Two operative cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm with isolated dissection of the abdominal aorta.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2021Article
- Demystifying penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of aorta: unrealised tyrant of senile aortic changes.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2021Review
- Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Retrograde Type A Aortic Intramural Hematoma.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The natural histories of intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) are highly variable as they may progress to aneurysm formation, rupture, or dissection, or even resolve, in the specific case of IMH. Imaging plays an increasingly important role in clinical and surgical management of IMH and PAU. In contrast to ulcer-like projections, images of intramural blood pools have not been widely reported in CT studies of patients with IMH. Understanding the imaging characteristics and the natural course of each of these entities would help clinicians and surgeons to identify patients at greatest risk for bad prognosis and may improve outcomes. This paper discusses the pathophysiology of these entities, the controversies regarding their natural history, and the prognostic factors that should be identified in CT scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.