Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360136›Full record

ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2019

An Electrophysiological Investigation of Power-Amplification in the Ballistic Mantis Shrimp Punch.

Daniel J Pollak, Kathryn D Feller, Étienne Serbe, Stanislav Mircic, Gregory J Gage

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Innovation in Neuroscience Education for Diverse Student Populations.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel J PollakBackyard Brains, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Kathryn D FellerDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, United Kingdom.
Étienne SerbeBackyard Brains, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Stanislav MircicBackyard Brains, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Gregory J GageBackyard Brains, Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DEUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Backyard Brains: Bringing Neurophysiology Into Secondary SchoolsR44MH093334 · NIMH · BACKYARD BRAINS, INC. · PI GAGE, GREGORY JOHN · 2013 to 2020
$4.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH093334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mantis shrimp are aggressive, burrowing crustaceans that hunt using one the fastest movements in the natural world. These stomatopods can crack the calcified shells of prey or spear down unsuspecting fish with lighting speed. Their strike makes use of power-amplification mechanisms to move their limbs much faster than is possible by muscles alone. Other arthropods such as crickets and grasshoppers also use power-amplified kicks that allow these animals to rapidly jump away from predator threats. Here we present a template laboratory exercise for studying the electrophysiology of power-amplified limb movement in arthropods, with a specific focus on mantis shrimp strikes. The exercise is designed in such a way that it can be applied to other species that perform power-amplified limb movements (e.g., house crickets,

Indexed as

behaviorconvergent evolutionelectrophysiologymotor controlmuscle activitypower amplification

Identifiers

PMID31360136
PMCPMC6650263
OpenAlexW2991524039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.