ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2019
Two Scientists Share Nobel Prize for the First Time! A Case Study Developed for Exploring the History of Neuroanatomy.
Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeing with Different Eyes. The ModuleMedical science educator · 2024Article
- Historical Depictions of the Brain: The Origins from the Non-Western World.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Mapping Human Neuronal Diversity in the Search for New Therapeutics: Using Real Human Neuron Data Sets to Build Student Quantitative Skills.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Adapting Case Studies for Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Courses.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2022Article
- A historical perspective on training students to create standardized maps of novel brain structure: Newly-uncovered resonances between past and present research-based neuroanatomy curricula.Neuroscience letters · 2021Review
- Effective Use of Student-Created Case Studies as Assessment in an Undergraduate Neuroscience Course.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Meningitis in College Students: Using a Case Study to Expose Introductory Neuroscience Students to Primary Scientific Literature and Applications of Neuroscience.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Innovation in Neuroscience Education for Diverse Student Populations.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this case, students read a 'press release' that describes the awarding of the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramon y Cajal. The case was developed to highlight the historical significance of these first descriptions of the nervous system for an upper level undergraduate neuroanatomy course. The dialogue was presented in a way to pique the students' interest by focusing on the disagreement between the two scientists on the structure and arrangement of neurons in the brain and peripheral nervous system. In the middle of the case, there were two concept check questions to ensure that the students understood the conflicting theories put forth by Golgi and Ramon y Cajal. At the end of the narrative, the class was broken into groups and assigned a series of questions to engage the students in reading primary literature (e.g., the acceptance speeches of both scientists), as well as secondary review articles on both Golgi's and Ramon y Cajal's contributions to the field of neuroscience. A series of primary and secondary articles was provided to the class, although this could be optional (depending on the course/level of students). Students presented their answers to the class in the form of short presentations. The case could also be used in an introductory neuroscience class to present the foundations of neuroanatomy, controversies in scientific discovery, biases that have existed or still exist, and how scientific information was disseminated prior to the 21
Indexed as
Identifiers
31360133PMC6650256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.