Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360130›Full record

ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2019

Motivation, Belongingness, and Anxiety in Neuroscience Undergraduates: Emphasizing First-Generation College Students.

Monica M Gaudier-Diaz, Manuela Sinisterra, Keely A Muscatell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Call for collaboration: Drafting a concept inventory for assessing neuroscience courses and curriculum.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Learning How to Code While Analyzing an Open Access Electrophysiology Dataset.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Quantitative Indicators of Continued Growth in Undergraduate Neuroscience Education in the US.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Innovation in Neuroscience Education for Diverse Student Populations.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica M Gaudier-DiazDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Manuela SinisterraDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Keely A MuscatellDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.

Funding

SEEDING POSTDOCTORAL INNOVATORS IN RESEARCH &EDUCATIONK12GM000678 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DONALD T LYSLE, Kathryn Joanna Reissner · 1999 to 2026
$30.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of undergraduate neuroscience programs nation-wide demonstrates that interest in this field is escalating. By understanding what motivates neuroscience undergraduates to do well and how they generally feel toward their major and environment, educators will be better able to attend to the needs of their neuroscience students. Thus, the present study aimed to characterize the psychosocial profiles of neuroscience majors in the U.S., with a particular interest in potential differences by generation in college, school type, and gender. For this, U.S. institutions that offer a neuroscience major were identified, and program directors/coordinators were asked to share a study survey with neuroscience majors at their school. The survey, which included demographics and measures of motivation, sense of belongingness, and anxiety, was completed by 756 students from 69 different institutions. Results showed that first-generation college students had lower academic performance (i.e., GPA), which was mediated by differences in motivation, and test- and trait-anxiety. Further, students from Liberal Arts Colleges reported valuing neuroscience courses more than students at National Universities, and the desire to meet others expectations, value of neuroscience course work, and anxiety were higher among female neuroscience students than males. Finally, test-anxiety was the strongest correlate of academic performance. These insights help identify potential targets for developing new teaching and advising strategies that could be employed to facilitate success among all neuroscience undergraduates.

Indexed as

academic performanceanxietybelongingnessfirst-generation studentsmotivationneuroscience major

Identifiers

PMID31360130
PMCPMC6650254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.