Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360091›Full record

ReviewBlood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy2018

Smoldering multiple myeloma: prevalence and current evidence guiding treatment decisions.

Agnieszka Blum, Despina Bazou, Peter O'Gorman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Smouldering Myeloma: Chasing a Hyperviscous Sample.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agnieszka BlumDepartment of Hematology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, UK, agnieszkablum@mater.ie.
Despina BazouDepartment of Hematology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, UK, agnieszkablum@mater.ie.
Peter O'GormanDepartment of Hematology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, UK, agnieszkablum@mater.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic plasma cell proliferative disorder associated with risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) or amyloidosis. In comparison to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), SMM has a much higher risk of progression to MM. Thanks to advances in our understanding of the risk factors, the subset of patients with ultra-high risk of progression to MM (80%-90% at 2 years) has been identified. The revision of the diagnostic criteria resulted in changes in the management of this cohort of patients. In contrast to the management guidelines for MGUS patients, SMM patients need to be studied more intensively in order to identify biomarkers necessary for accurate risk stratification. In this review, we focus on the risk of progression from SMM to MM, as well as the influence of early treatment on overall survival, time to progression and quality of life.

Indexed as

biomarkergenomic aberrationsglycan analysisrisk factorsmoldering multiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID31360091
PMCPMC6467346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.