Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31360026›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update.

Naveen Kalra, Pankaj Gupta, Manphool Singhal, Rajesh Gupta, Vikas Gupta, Radhika Srinivasan, Bhagwant R Mittal, Radha K Dhiman, Niranjan Khandelwal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05718115 (Deep Learning Radiogenomics For Individualized Therapy in Unresectable Gallbladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05718115 unknown statusnot on this map

Deep Learning Radiogenomics For Individualized Therapy in Unresectable Gallbladder Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhRan2023 to 2023Enrolled75ConditionsGallbladder CancerArmsCT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Diagnostic Accuracy ofWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naveen KalraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Manphool SinghalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Rajesh GuptaDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Vikas GuptaDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Radhika SrinivasanDepartment of Cytology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Bhagwant R MittalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Radha K DhimanDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Niranjan KhandelwalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder Carcinoma (GBCA) is the most common biliary tract malignancy. As the disease is often diagnosed clinically in an advanced stage, the survival rates are dismal. Imaging studies allow for an early diagnosis of malignancy, though the findings may be indistinguishable from non-malignant disease processes affecting the gallbladder. Attempts have been made to make a specific diagnosis of GBCA at an early stage on imaging studies. Ultrasonography (US) is the most commonly employed technique for gallbladder evaluation. Gallbladder wall thickening is the most common finding of early GBCA and in this context, US is non-specific. Recently, contrast enhanced ultrasound has been shown to be effective in differentiating benign from malignant disease. Multidetector computed tomography represents the most robust imaging technique in evaluation of GBCA. It provides relatively sensitive evaluation of mural thickening, though it is not entirely specific and issues in differentiating GBCA from xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis do arise. Due to its superior soft tissue resolution, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides excellent delineation of gallbladder and biliary tree involvement. When coupled with functional MRI techniques, such as diffusion-weighted and perfusion imaging, it provides a useful problem solving tool for interrogating the malignant potential of nonspecific gallbladder lesions and detection of metastases. Positron emission tomography has a role in detection of distant metastases and following patients following treatment for malignancy. We review the current role of various imaging modalities in evaluating patients with GBCA.

Indexed as

carcinomaCEUS, Contrast Enhanced UltrasoundgallbladderGBCA, Gallbladder CarcinomaHRUS, High Resolution USimagingMDCT, Multidetector Computed TomographyMRI, Magnetic Resonance ImagingPET, Positron Emission TomographyUS, Ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31360026
PMCPMC6637089
OpenAlexW2801862727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.