Frequency and impact of incidental findings on computed tomography during work-up for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: single centre experience and review of the literature.

objectiveTo assess the frequency and impact of incidental findings (IF) on CT during work-up for transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI).

methodsA consecutive cohort of patients referred for consideration of TAVI who underwent a CT scan between 2009 and 2018 were studied retrospectively. CT reports were reviewed for the presence of IFs and categorised based upon their clinical significance: (a) insignificant-findings that did not require specific treatment or follow-up; (b) intermediate-findings that did not impact on the decision-making process but required follow-up; (c) significant-findings that either required urgent investigation or meant that TAVI was clinically inappropriate.

resultsA total of 652 patients were included, whose median age was 82 years. One or more insignificant IF was found in 95.6% of patients. Intermediate IFs were documented in 5.4%. 91 (14%) patients had at least one significant IF. These included possible malignancy in 67 (74%). The ultimate decision to offer aortic valve intervention was only changed by the presence of an IF in 3.5% of cases.

conclusionClinically significant IFs are detected in more than 1 in 10 of patients undergoing CT as part of a TAVI work-up, although just over half of these patients still receive aortic valve intervention. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study is the largest UK cohort, which, when combined with a review of existing literature, provides a clear picture of the frequency and clinical impact of IFs found at CT for TAVI assessment.