Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359565›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2020

Modeling development of frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) asymmetry: Sex differences and links with temperament.

Maria A Gartstein, Gregory R Hancock, Natalia V Potapova, Susan D Calkins, Martha Ann Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. EEG neurosubtyping of infants predicts language trajectories.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria A GartsteinDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Gregory R HancockDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, Measurement, Statistics and Evaluation (EDMS), College Park, MD, USA.
Natalia V PotapovaDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Susan D CalkinsDepartment of Psychology, Human Development and Family Studies, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Martha Ann BellDepartment of Pschology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Funding

Psychobiology of Cognitive DevelopmentR01HD049878 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BELL, MARTHA ANN · 2007 to 2017
$5.0M
Infant Temperament and Cognitive DevelopmentR03HD043057 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BELL, MARTHA ANN · 2003 to 2004
$141k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049878NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD043057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asymmetric patterns of frontal brain electrical activity reflect approach and avoidance tendencies, with stability of relative right activation associated with withdrawal emotions/motivation and left hemisphere activation linked with approach and positive affect. However, considerable shifts in approach/avoidance-related lateralization have been reported for children not targeted because of extreme temperament. In this study, dynamic effects of frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) power within and across hemispheres were examined throughout early childhood. Specifically, EEG indicators at 5, 10, 24, 36, 48, and 72 months-of-age (n = 410) were analyzed via a hybrid of difference score and panel design models, with baseline measures and subsequent time-to-time differences modeled as potentially influencing all subsequent amounts of time-to-time change (i.e., predictively saturated). Infant sex was considered as a moderator of dynamic developmental effects, with temperament attributes measured at 5 months examined as predictors of EEG hemisphere development. Overall, change in left and right frontal EEG power predicted declining subsequent change in the same hemisphere, with effects on the opposing neurobehavioral system enhancing later growth. Infant sex moderated the pattern of within and across-hemisphere effects, wherein for girls more prominent left hemisphere influences on the right hemisphere EEG changes were noted and right hemisphere effects were more salient for boys. Largely similar patterns of temperament prediction were observed for the left and the right EEG power changes, with limited sex differences in links between temperament and growth parameters. Results were interpreted in the context of comparable analyses using parietal power values, which provided evidence for unique frontal effects.

Indexed as

ChildElectroencephalographyFemaleFrontal LobeHumansInfantMaleMotivationSex CharacteristicsTemperamentdevelopmental processesEEG asymmetrylatent change scorespanel modelssex differencestemperament

Identifiers

PMID31359565
PMCPMC6893078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.