Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359460›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of neurology2019

A Trial of Sertraline or Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression in Epilepsy.

Frank G Gilliam, Kevin J Black, Jewell Carter, Kenneth E Freedland, Yvette I Sheline, Wei-Yann Tsai, Patrick J Lustman

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Antidepressants for people with epilepsy and depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Management of anhedonia after epilepsy surgery.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Frank G GilliamDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.ORCID 0000-0002-8739-5476
Kevin J BlackDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-6921-9567
Jewell CarterDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University, St Louis, MO.
Kenneth E FreedlandDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University, St Louis, MO.
Yvette I ShelineDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Wei-Yann TsaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Patrick J LustmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University, St Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

DEPRESSION AND HEALTH OUTCOMES IN REFRACTORY EPILEPSYR01NS040808 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GILLIAM, FRANK G · 2001 to 2005
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLimited evidence is available to guide treatment of depression for persons with epilepsy. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of sertraline and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for depression, quality of life, seizures, and adverse treatment effects.

methodsWe randomly assigned 140 adult outpatients with epilepsy and current major depressive disorder to sertraline or weekly CBT for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was remission from depression based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Secondary outcomes included the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 (QOLIE-89) seizure rates, the Adverse Events Profile (AEP), the Beck Depression Inventory, and MINI Suicide Risk Module.

resultsIn the intention-to-treat analysis, 38 (52.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = ±12) of the 72 subjects assigned to sertraline and 41 (60.3%; 95% CI = ±11.6) of the 68 subjects in the CBT group achieved remission; the lower bound of efficacy for both groups was greater than our historical placebo control group upper bound of 33.7%. Difference in time to remission between groups was 2.8 days (95% CI = ±0.43; p = 0.79). The percent improvement of mean QOLIE-89 scores was significant for both the CBT (25.7%; p < 0.001) and sertraline (28.3%; p < 0.001) groups. The difference in occurrence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures between groups was 0.3% (95% CI = ±8.6; p = 0.95). Suicide risk at final assessment was associated with persistent depression (p < 0.0001) but not seizures or sertraline.

interpretationDepression remitted in just over one-half of subjects following sertraline or CBT. Despite the complex psychosocial disability associated with epilepsy, improving depression benefits quality of life. Serotonin reuptake inhibition does not appear to increase seizures or suicidality in persons with epilepsy. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:552-560.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultAgedEpilepsyFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSertralineTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSertraline

Identifiers

PMID31359460
PMCPMC7012268
OpenAlexW2964927046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.