Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359435›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2019

Predictors and moderators of recurring self-harm in adolescents participating in a comparative treatment trial of psychological interventions.

Molly Adrian, Elizabeth McCauley, Michele S Berk, Joan R Asarnow, Kathryn Korslund, Claudia Avina, Robert Gallop, Marsha M Linehan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trajectories of Treatment Response and Nonresponse in Youth at High Risk for Suicide.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Molly AdrianCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth McCauleyCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michele S BerkDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavior Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Joan R AsarnowDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kathryn KorslundDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Claudia AvinaDepartment of Mathematics, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, West Carson, CA, USA.
Robert GallopWest Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester, PA, USA.
Marsha M LinehanDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USStanford Medicine · USUCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWest Chester University · US

Funding

UW Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Career Development Program K12 2014 2019K12HS022982 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SULLIVAN, SEAN D · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
1/2-Treatment of Suicidal and Self-Injurious Adolescents with Emotional DysregulaR01MH090159 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LINEHAN, MARSHA · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
2_2 Treatment of Suicidal and Self_Injurous Adolescents with Emotional DysregulaR01MH093898 · NIMH · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ASARNOW, JOAN ROSENBAUM, BERK, MICHELE STACY · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022982NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH090159NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093898NIMH NIH HHS R01MH93898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn primary analyses, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) was associated with greater reduction in self-harm during treatment than individual/group supportive therapy (IGST). The objective of this paper was to examine predictors and moderators of treatment outcomes for suicidal adolescents who participated in a randomized controlled trial evaluating DBT and IGST.

methodsAdolescents (N = 173) were included in the intent-to-treat sample and randomized to receive 6 months of DBT or IGST. Potential baseline predictors and moderators were identified within four categories: demographics, severity markers, parental psychopathology, and psychosocial variables. Primary outcomes were suicide attempts (SA) and nonsuicidal self-injury evaluated at baseline, midtreatment (3 months), and end of treatment (6 months) via the Suicide Attempt and Self-Injury Interview (Psychological Assessment, 18, 2006, 303). For each moderator or predictor, a generalized linear mixed model was conducted to examine main and interactive effects of treatment and the candidate variable on outcomes.

resultsAdolescents with higher family conflict, more extensive self-harm histories, and more externalizing problems produced on average more reduction on SH frequency from baseline to post-treatment. Adolescents meeting BPD diagnosis were more likely to have high SH frequency at post-treatment. Analyses indicated significant moderation effects for emotion dysregulation on NSSI and SH. DBT was associated with better rates of improvement compared to IGST for adolescents with higher baseline emotion dysregulation and those whose parents reported greater psychopathology and emotion dysregulation. A significant moderation effect for ethnicity on SA over the treatment period was observed, where DBT produced better rate of improvement compared to IGST for Hispanic/Latino individuals.

conclusionsThese findings may help to inform salient treatment targets and guide treatment planning. Adolescents that have high levels of family conflict, externalizing problems, and increased level of severity markers demonstrated the most change in self-harm behaviors over the course of treatment and benefitted from both treatment interventions. Those with higher levels of emotion dysregulation and parent psychopathology may benefit more from the DBT.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorFamily ConflictOutcome Assessment, Health CareProblem BehaviorPsychotherapyAdolescentDialectical Behavior TherapyFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapy, GroupRecurrenceSelf-Injurious BehaviorSeverity of Illness Indexdialectical behavior therapyModeratorspredictorstreatment response

Identifiers

PMID31359435
PMCPMC6849475
OpenAlexW2964756638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.