Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31359432›Full record

SynthesisEcology2019

Sensitivity to AMF species is greater in late-successional than early-successional native or nonnative grassland plants.

Tanya E Cheeke, Chaoyuan Zheng, Liz Koziol, Carli R Gurholt, James D Bever

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Inoculation with old-growth microbes improves restoration quality and reduces non-native encroachment after seven years.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Legume life history interacts with land use degradation of rhizobia: Implications for restoration success.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanya E CheekeSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, 2710 Crimson Way, Richland, Washington, 99354, USA.
Chaoyuan ZhengCollege of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, No. 15 Shangxiadian Road, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Liz KoziolKansas Biological Station, 2101 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, Kansas, 66044, USA.
Carli R GurholtWisconsin School of Professional Psychology, 9120 W. Hampton Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53225, USA.
James D BeverKansas Biological Station and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitivity of plant species to individual arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal species is of primary importance to understanding the role of AM fungal diversity and composition in plant ecology. Currently, we do not have a predictive framework for understanding which plant species are sensitive to different AM fungal species. In two greenhouse studies, we tested for differences in plant sensitivity to different AM fungal species and mycorrhizal responsiveness across 17 grassland plant species of North America that varied in successional stage, native status, and plant family by growing plants with different AM fungal treatments including eight single AM fungal isolates, diverse mixtures of AM fungi, and non-inoculated controls. We found that late successional grassland plant species were highly responsive to AM fungi and exhibited stronger sensitivity in their response to individual AM fungal taxa compared to nonnative or early successional native grassland plant species. We confirmed these results using a meta-analysis that included 13 experiments, 37 plant species, and 40 fungal isolates (from nine publications and two greenhouse experiments presented herein). Mycorrhizal responsiveness and sensitivity of response (i.e., variation in plant biomass response to different AM fungal taxa) did not differ by the source of fungal inocula (i.e., local or not local) or plant family. Sensitivity of plant response to AM fungal species was consistently correlated with the average mycorrhizal response of that plant species. This study identifies that AM fungal identity is more important to the growth of late successional plant species than early successional or nonnative plant species, thereby predicting that AM fungal composition will be more important to plant community dynamics in late successional communities than in early successional or invaded plant communities.

Indexed as

GrasslandMycorrhizaeBiomassNorth AmericaPlant RootsPlantsSoil Microbiologyarbuscular mycorrhizal fungicoefficient of variationgrasslandinoculationmycorrhizal responsivenessplant sensitivityplant successional stageprairie

Identifiers

PMID31359432
PMCPMC6916349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.